Navigation Bar

Home -> Independent Union Connection -> Article

Independent Union Connection

A Newsletter Dedicated To Rank-and-File Unionism


Independent Union Connection

Independent
Union
Connection

Got a tough question facing your independent union?

Go ahead ... Ask the Independent Unionist! ... Our panel of experts will be glad to tackle your issue. 

Read what others are asking!

Back to the Independent Union Connection

 

 

A Union History
The Research
Development
and Technical
Employees' Union

Submitted by David H. Gay,
President, RDTEU,
Belmont, MA

The Research Development and Technical Employees' Union was founded by technicians at MIT over 50 years ago. This Union still remains independent. We represent over 700 members at MIT, Draper Laboratory and Lincoln Laboratory. The employees we represent include - technicians, machinists, stock clerks, custodians, photographers, and physical plant employees. The Union's Executive Board is comprised of thirteen members. Three Executive Board members from each unit and four constitutional officers - President, Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary.

The RDTEU negotiates two contracts — one which covers workers at MIT/Lincoln Laboratory and another which covers workers at Draper Laboratory. Two years ago, in our last contract negotiations with MIT, the Union engaged in a bitter struggle with MIT to combat their re-engineering plans. MIT formed a number of re-engineering teams to decide which departments were not cost efficient and make recommendations to possible eliminate these departments. The RDTEU was not included in any of these discussions or plans.

MIT targeted the Office of Laboratory Supplies where thirteen RDTEU members workers and closed this department. After this department closed, MIT brought in the supply company, VWR Scientific, to perform many of the exact same functions. The Union grieved MIT's decision to close this department and to outsource our jobs. In addition, the Union mounted a strong publicity campaign to pressure MIT into offering an early incentive program for those workers who were laid off from this department and to give other employees the opportunity to retire early in other departments that may be re-engineered out of existence.

MIT ultimately offered a substantial early retirement incentive program. For the employees who were near the age of retirement, but were in potential danger of losing their jobs, this program gave them the opportunity to leave MIT with a far more equitable option. The issue of whether MIT has the right to re-engineer people out of a job and outsource the same work is still pending an arbitrator's decision.


Independent Connection

Home • About UE • Organize! • Independent Unions • Search • Site Guide • What's New • Contact UE
UE News • Political Action • Info for Workers • Resources • Education • Health & Safety • International • Links